Home Contact Register Subscribe to the Beacon Login

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

DENNIS PATRICK: A REAL SAD POWER GRAB!

There is an old saying, “When you’re sent to drain a swamp and you’re standing in water up to your neck with alligators swimming all around -- don’t lose sight of the objective.”

With attention focused on the opposition to health care reform at town hall meetings, the US House has yet to vote on H.R. 3200, the major health care bill. If and when it does so, the bill then goes to the US Senate where passage remains murky. The Senate has no clearly identifiable health care bill but continues crafting one in committees.

Much is made of “fixing” Medicare. Medicare has been a known problem ignored by congress for years. It isn’t necessary to hastily rework the entire health care system with an overarching government replacement to “fix” Medicare.

Even as congressmen and senators get an ear full on the various health care proposals, the Senate will quietly take up H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, when they return from their summer listening tour. This is the House version of Cap and Trade legislation. Once the Senate acts on Cap and Trade, it’s on to the president for signature. Then Cap and Trade is a done deal.

In a way, juggling these bills is much like a political shell game. You focus on the shells and miss the pea.

Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) is very certain the Senate will not pass a “public option” health care plan. Interestingly, a health care amendment was submitted by his colleague Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) that was adopted with bipartisan support by the Senate Heath Committee. If adopted as part of any final health care bill, the amendment would require all senators, congressmen and their staffs to come under whatever option congress passes and the president signs. This illustrates a very good point. If health care reform is so good for the people, surely it’s good for congress as well.

When I asked Senator Conrad at a town hall meeting if he supported Senator Coburn’s bipartisan amendment his response was that “there would be no public option passed in the Senate.” This was a neat parry, a typical political non-answer. I took it as a “No.” After all, why should the patricians stoop to the level of plebes and live under the same health care they think best for the rest of us?

No public option? Let’s see if a public option resurrects itself under a different name such as a health care co-op. Why don’t I trust these people?

So much for the health care listening tour.

I had another question the opportunity for which never presented itself for the asking. It’s a nit picking Cap and Trade question. Washington’s mantra is chanted over and over, “We must break our dependence on foreign oil.” Fair enough. But, there are the inevitable unintended consequences accompanying the usual government “solution.”

A push is on to substitute hybrid or fully electric cars for cars using the internal combustion engine. Disregard for a moment that our number one and number three suppliers of oil are Canada and Mexico in that order. Venezuela is second with all other countries arrayed after them. Disregard also the need to generate the electric energy to charge the batteries. Think about the composition of the batteries.

An important component of the rechargeable batteries is lithium. A full 50% of the world’s supply of lithium comes from Bolivia, a close friend of Hugo Chavez. Another 25% comes from Chile. Seventy-five percent of the world’s lithium comes from these two countries.

My question is, “Aren’t we depending to an even greater extent for our supply of lithium from overseas than we are currently for oil?” In other words, aren’t we trading a headache for an upset stomach?

Maybe, just maybe, health care and cap and trade legislation have nothing to do with either health or saving the environment. Maybe these and other efforts have more to do with consolidating political power in the hands of a few Washington politicians to the detriment of our freedom.

Dennis M. Patrick can be contacted at P. O. Box 337, Stanley, ND 58784 or (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Click here to email your elected representatives.

Comments

Avatar for Halatbis

Trust these people?  Of course we cannot trust them, but that is not the only serious concern.  They are forging ahead with changes to the economy, banking system, the energy industry, the health care industry, the health insurance industry, autos, housing, etc. etc.

Our national economy, along with much of the world’s economy, is in the ditch—-we are borrowing billions, spending trillions——and these crazy people in the Dem. Party are bent on CHANGING some of the major parts of the U.S. national industry and economy!
This is a re-play of the blunders committed by Hoover in 1930/31, and then taken up by F.D. Roosevelt who then inserted the federal government into the economy and industry making the depression into the great depression.

It is no surprise that Pres. Obama has turned out to be socialist—we knew that going into November 2008.  We did not realize the crazies that would come out of the woodwork when he came to office.  The crazies in congress have taken control and they mean to put government in control of every facet of our lives—-from birth to the grave.

Our founding fathers could see who their enemy was—King George and the parliament.  Today, our enemy is within, and it is far more dangerous to our freedom than the British in 1776.

Halatbis on August 18, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Avatar for Sally Morris

You are right to suspect the imminent introduction of co-ops.  And to that I can only ask who was it not that long ago who deplored WalMart’s “predatory” practice of coming into a town, lowering prices artificially so as to drive others out and then going on as before, only now with no competition?  I imagine the same people who now think co-ops are a good idea, because these people don’t believe in the market place or private enterprise.  To them I would say, what could possibly be more openly predatory and more precisely designed to end private health insurance than a TAX-FUNDED system and price structure to supplant this industry with a federal “co-op”.  The whole co-op idea, so central to electrifying the prairies in the 1920’s and ‘30’s, was necessary, as were telephone co-ops, because the industry was basically a public utility.  The telephone systems have graduated from that status and now stand more or less on their own.  Except in remote areas where it’s unprofitable for them to work, phones are on the private enterprise system, basically.  Most co-ops in the area of rural electricity were enterprises which were required to pay back the federally-guaranteed loans which launched them and are now a matter of user support, overseen by public service commissions. 

The benign “co-op"s we are familiar with and use, such as food co-ops, etc., are simply business arrangements with voluntary participants and not tax-supported.  Tax support can be translated to mean “involuntary”.  And this must be avoided.  Co-ops in health insurance are, and are intended by those who conceive them, as only a transitional step to carry us from private sector health care insurance AND HEALTH CARE AND TREATMENT ITSELF to government paid and run health care.

Sally Morris on August 19, 2009 at 06:26 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?