Home Contact Register Subscribe to the Beacon Login

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

DUSTIN GAWRYLOW: GIVING CREDIT TO HIGHER ED SKEPTICS

It's often easy to criticize people for promoting inappropriate policies, but the North Dakota Taxpayers' Association also recognizes the need to credit those who support responsible policies and question existing ones.  There many legislative leaders doing this for a long time.

While some editorial boards believe the North Dakota University System can do no wrong, we need lawmakers with the courage to point out its problems.  These lawmakers know that questioning one iota of the University System's governance invites editorial boards to bash them.  
 
Rep. Mark Dosch (R- District 32 Bismarck) has consistently led the quest for more accountability in higher education.  While it is not a popular view among the editorial elites, we need to support his calls for transparency and accountability in the University System. 
 
By simply suggesting that higher education funds should undergo a cost-benefit analysis, Rep. Dosch has attracted scorn from editorial boards and the defenders of the status quo.
 
Rep. Dosch rightly points out that even though nearly $500 million has been spent to build new facilities on North Dakota's college campuses over the last few years, those same campuses have deferred more than the $100 million required to maintain existing buildings.
 
Enlightening the public to how campuses constantly demand more construction without maintaining what they already have makes Rep. Dosch the target of those who consider the University System to be their own little empire.
 
Nothing seems to deter the University System spending addicts from lashing out at him or others with the courage to question its decisions.
 
Even Sen. Tim Flakoll (R- District 44 Fargo) questions the University System's latest requests for more construction funds. Sen. Flakoll is not known for challenging the University System, but certainly deserves credit here.
 
"Sen. Tim Flakoll, R-Fargo, said he thinks there would be little Senate support for the projects if the same list had campus names and communities deleted, thereby neutralizing legislators' loyalties to certain schools."  Flakoll said, "It lacks vision and inspiration to take us to the next level".
 
He asked for objective information of how the priorities rankings were created.  He said some of the projects are good, but wants to see more projects that would help generate new wealth, business development, and diversify the economy.
 
Sen. Flakoll is right in this case, the public deserves to know how these lists of demands were created. 
 
It is time to look at the real issues in higher education, which are the ever-rising student loan debt-loads and the marketability of the graduates in North Dakota.  Large sprawling campuses won't provide marketable skills to graduates.
 
Throwing money around to build little empires around the state, a taxpayer's expense, does not address any of the real issues. 

Click here to email your elected representatives.

Comments

No Comments Yet

Post a Comment


Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?