Dakota Beacon

By now, millions of us have watched James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas exposé on the vote harvesting going on as we speak in MInneapolis.  Of course it is not just happening in Ilhan Omar’s thoroughly corrupt district and state, it is rampant throughout the U.S.  This would seem to be the game plan now that people are reacting negatively to business shutdowns and the consequent crashing of the economy and to rioting in the cities and towns across the country and rallying to President Trump. 

This is not really “news” to any of us who have been watching what goes on in the Twin Cities - it explains the weird behavior of the Minneapolis City Council and the choice of a preppy with an inadequate sense of rhythm, who tries to line-dance with rioters instead of maintaining law and order in his city, watching it burn literally to the ground instead of bringing order to his streets.  (The losers, after all, are just a bunch of little people who run everyday businesses - so who cares, right?)  

It has been a mystery to some that a seemingly normal, Midwestern city would be electing a Somali immigrant who has expressed nothing but contempt for this country, against whom there is convincing evidence of fraud of almost every kind - election fraud, student loan fraud, immigration and marriage fraud - to a seat in Congress.  It used to be a respectable institution.  The answer has been in front of us all along.  We all knew.  But along comes James O’Keefe and he gels it up on tape.  

We have an interesting cast of characters - KingLibanI, for example, a sort of juice man who collects ballots from people for money.  He makes it clear what makes the wheels turn, even as he is turning them - money.  If you don’t have it, he says, you shouldn’t even be here.  No argument there, I guess.  But his dashboard is piled high with stacks of envelopes containing ballots - he is collecting them for Jamal Osman, he says on the tape, in a mixture of pigeon English and Somali.  In an office, a spokesman for a Somali Watch organization, Omar Jamal, discourses on the difficulty of conducting anything like a normal election.  He says many of the immigrants involved in the vote harvesting have no idea how elections here work.  They come from a military dictatorship.  If someone comes to their door and demands a ballot, why, give it to him.  No questions asked.  The process seems pretty cut and dried, really.  The ballots are filled in and in cases where money changes hands, it does so when the voter’s signature goes on the pre-filled-in ballot.  After all, it is unlikely that these voters know one candidate from the other in any case.  Most of them do not know English.  How would they follow the issues of the day?   

It is really the fault of our government that we have this.  It is intentional, of course.  We must understand this.  This is why so many “refugees” have been sent into states that are usually considered “red”.  Some strategically placed foreign voters could change the outcome of a national election and heavily impact the future of the Senate and Congress, not to mention placing a few of these counterproductive entities in city governments.  

Our cities are feeling the pain which results when this reckless and destructive voting scheme is combined with the insurrection underway against our form of government by Marxists like the leadership of Black Lives Matter.  It is deadly.  

We should mend this mess, but unfortunately, as Omar Jamal remarked in the O’Keefe video, it is probably too late to fix.  We have allowed ourselves to be cowed into immigration and voting practices which cannot but destroy us.  People who love immigration are quick to tell us how “America is a nation of immigrants”  and how all of our ancestors came here from somewhere else and built this great country.  The part they leave out is that we did not make it easy for them to come here.  Those hardy souls who came here from somewhere else to build a great nation overcame massive hurdles.  First, they had to come up with the fare.  They needed someone over here to sponsor them, someone who was established enough to help them and be responsible.  They needed to be physically and mentlaly healthy. They needed skills in English and marketable work skills.  They and their children were expected to learn American customs, English language, our history, show allegiance to our flag and our nation, renouncing their own.  

Mark Krikorian, in his book, The Case Against Legal and Illegal Immigration, laid out the reasons why immigratrion today is problematic for America. 

1. America today cannot absorb large numbers of laborer - we don't have factories starting up (maybe this will change) so work is scarce for them.

2. We closed the frontier over 100 years ago - there is no unclaimed land to homestead.

3. Farming is now a mass-production, corporate affair, so instead of farm hands on family farms they use these alien laborers whom they pay and treat poorly - transient workers.

4. Immigrants no longer sever ties with their countries of origin.  Where once it was necessary to write letters and send them across the sea in ships, today we have cell phones.  No one is more than a phone call away, around the clock.  Money can be wired instantaneously.  People now consider themselves to be citizens of their nation of origin or  “citizens of the world”, not proud citizens of the United States of America.  

5. Instead of assimilating, now those who come here expect - and get - classes in public schools in their own languages, or someone to assist them.  They have lawyers and social workers at most border cities to help them to access every kind of help - from food to health care to legal assistance to housing to education and jobs, should they want themf, to transportation.  This, by the way, is paid for by American taxpayers largely.  

6. The source of our incoming immigrants is found in regions with little to no shared culture with us.  This becomes important when we look at issues like election laws.  Such laws either don’t exist or are ignored in many of these regions.   These people are unlikely to take our laws very seriously.   They also fall prey to gang-like pressures often tied to organizations in home countries.  We are seeing this in Chinatowns everywhere in the world, as a matter of fact.   Instead of coming to America to begin a new, free life of opportunity, their mission, willing or not, to subvert our system and promote the country of origin.  

All of this tends to change America into something resembling the troubled lands from which these people have come - people bring with them what used to be left behind in the search for freedom and opportunity.  Now we have pressure to follow the customs and ways of these failed nations.  We should not expect America to be better for this.

We should enact reforms which prevent this kind of use and abuse of people who come here from other countries.  We should return to stricter regulations governing citizenship, we should make voting a privilege of a free people, not an instrument of corruption.  A vote should be an important right, not a commodity.  Sadly, I see little chance of this kind of reform.  Why?  The people most affected would benefit the most from reform.  But on the left we have a machine dedicated to overthrowing our government and Constitution.  On the right we have a tribe of cowards and weaklings who dare not say “excrement” if they are stepping in it.  There are two kinds of support for immigrants who cannot or will not assimilate and cannot or will not abide by our election laws.  On the left we have the on-going slow-mo revolution which uses them for their purpose.  On the right we have Wall Street and the people who want cheap goods, cheap labor, and figure they can keep themselves and their families safely above the grime of it all.  In the middle of this you have two forms of victims - ordinary native-born Americans and legal citizens, and immigrants from the Third World who have no power to change things and no in-depth knowledge of the country they “adopted”.  

So we have someone like O’Keefe, who rolls over the rock and shows us the gangster-like machinery of the Minnesota DFL, for example, and suddenly his irrefutable evidence on video is attacked, his witnesses intimidated.  Frankly, I would have been more suspicious if they had not been intimidated.  I think until we have evidence to the contrary, it is very safe to say that O’Keefe got the story right.

Your comments:  (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)