Dakota Beacon

Once, before they knew who I was, I had a job with the University of North Dakota.  I was an interviewer with the Social Science Research Institute, a sort of polling service, where we would make cold calls to people - usually in North Dakota, but occasionally farther afield - to conduct surveys.  Some were longer than others and some of our clients were frequent repeaters with surveys.  One such was an organization which sought to combat smoking.

We may all have different views of tobacco.  Some have a laissez-faire attitude while others are virtual Karens, busy-bodies who can’t stand the sight of anyone smoking a cigarette.  In between is a range of people who have differing views, informed by their own experience and knowledge.  Some opposed anyone smoking simply because they, personally, had a physical reaction against it.  Others felt that those who insisted on smoking should have a place where they could do so in peace.  There were good arguments on both sides.  After all, it is a free country.  Right?  One point of agreement was that smoking was not a healthy habit.  Nearly everyone agreed that it was not good for them.

Can you imagine demanding that everyone smoke?  Neither can I.  But how is this really different from the “vaccine” push?  We all know they don’t work to stop the spread or prevent catching the covid disease.  This is common knowledge, even though we repeat by rote the mantras of the pro-vaxxers, that we are taking them to “protect others”.  Obviously this cannot be true.  Some people who have not been paying attention still think they are protecting themselves, while others, more cynical, take them simply because they are expedient.  They want to go to a concert, they want no hassle in the grocery store, they want to take the cruise in the South Pacific this winter.  

What if we demanded that they take up smoking in order to do these things?  Would they?  Perhaps.  It would be just as logical.  While we know many of the hazards of smoking - emphysema, lung cancer, high blood pressure, etc., we are now learning every day of the hazards of taking these “vaccines”.  We are assured that they are “safe”, though.  You will never hear one of the pro-vaxxers - whether in government or in the world of pop celebrities - who will consider cautioning us about the possible risks.  Nope.  It’s all good.  

Now, we have not seen any long-term studies, have we?  Of course not - because these things burst on the market last December.  It has barely been available for a year.  Already we are seeing horrible side effects (“adverse events”) and many deaths but not to worry - we can’t prove they have anything to do with the “vaccines”.  In fact, the people who are responsible for keeping track of these things for us have decided that if someone has one of these “adverse events” or dies within 14 days of being vaccinated they are not “vaccine” related incidents.  Well, that makes sense, right?  

If we used that yardstick we would never try to stop anyone from smoking.  You can sit and relax with a cigarette and a cup of coffee or whatever you like, day after day after day, year after year, with absolutely no adverse effects at all.  In fact, some people think they help with weight loss.  

I can still remember television stars touting cigarettes as healthy.  Lucille Ball did such a commercial.  Lots of people did.  I remember how the anti-smoking crowd absolutely gloated when the Marlboro Man died of lung cancer.  There followed a period when these same celebrities and others made public service announcements warning us not to smoke.  The actor who played “Hamilton Burger” on Perry Mason - Perry’s nemesis, the “bad guy” - made such a PSA when he was dying.  One gave credit to the courage of these people to come forward for the sake of others, perhaps averting another death or injury.  It was their last redeeming effort for others.

Perhaps one day we will see this in regard to the phony “vaccines”.  Maybe not, though.  These are much faster-acting than tobacco.  It took decades for people to destroy their health with cigarettes but covid “vaccines” are much faster acting than tobacco.  It may take only a few short months or years to die of these.  It is very likely that by the time death comes knocking at their doors these people will be in no condition to make PSAs - many of them are finding it difficult to speak after only a few weeks.  

Nevertheless, these ill effects and deaths are always going to be ascribed to something else.  We could have done the same with cigarettes - just say the person died of natural causes.  It would have been true in a way.  But a lie in another way.

Who among us would even consider making smoking tobacco a condition for moving about in society, shopping, dining out, going on a cruise, boarding an airplane, attending school, keeping a job?  Is there anyone that silly?  There used to be doctors who told us smoking was good for us.  Had we applied the same standards to cigarettes we do to these “vaccines”, we’d all be smoking.  Perhaps enjoying it.  After all, how can you tie ill health and death to cigarettes?  It takes years and years - decades - to see the effects.  

Yet the “vaccines” get a pass.  If someone dies suddenly who was in perfect health the day before they took the “vaccine”, the death must be - MUST be - due to other causes.  Hey, people die suddenly for no apparent reason every day, right?  Children have been known to keel over with heart attacks, right?  Well, not really.  But if the kid just took up smoking instead, he might be around at least into his 50s.  

There is a special place in hell for anyone who would inject a child or take a child for an injection of something totally experimental, with absolutely no upside - no reason at all to risk the health of anyone, much less a child, to perhaps avoid covid.   And we all know by now you can’t even avoid covid with these shots.  There is also a spit somewhere in the inferno for those who inject elderly people who are not able or willing to give their informed consent.  The rest of us should just make our own decision.  Just as people did with smoking.  

We have no more reason to link smoking with health problems and death than we do to link these rotten “vaccines” with health problems and death.  Doctors have been wrong before, they are wrong now, when they promote these injections.  Most of them have absolutely no idea what is in them, what they are injecting into us.  No idea at all.  There are no studies.  There is no long-term data.  They (and we) are flying blind when we take these.  At least you can take measures to mitigate damage due to smoking.  After a period of abstention from smoking you have a chance at improved health.  With the “vaccines” there is virtually nothing you can do to clear out the toxins.  You’re stuck.

Let’s just suggest people start smoking again.  It makes just as much sense as promoting the “vaccines” and probably has more health benefits.

.