Dakota Beacon

Yesterday I included in my post a couple of opportunities to sign petitions showing your commitment to and solidarity with the effort to hold China accountable and with the effort to permanently end the threat of the UN Small Arms Treaty - a holdover from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s bad old days under the Obama administration.  These are both very worthy causes and deserve your support - I hope you’ll go back and read them and sign them if you agree with me that 1) China needs to be held accountable for many reasons, the least of which is not that if we don’t we are inviting COVID-20; and that 2) we don’t ever want to surrender our American sovereignty and our Constitution and Bill of Rights to a leftist United Nations organization.  We should NEVER allow our sovereignty and our American law to be subordinated to any entity, say nothing of one as evil as the United Nations has proven itself - most recently through its World Health Organization under “Tedros”.  

Today I found another call for support for holding China accountable, this time through Nikki Haley.  I read and signed it.  I recommend you read it and if you agree, sign it also.  We need to assert ourselves.  So far it’s still our country.  But in calling China on the carpet over this as they well deserve, we need to clean up our own backyard.  By that I mean corruption in our highest levels - with regard to the virus attack.

The virus began to infect humans in Wuhan.  This is important.  The government of the People’s Republic of China has officially declared that there are no wet markets in China - that this concept is “unknown” in China.  (Of course, like everything else, this public statement is pure hooey, but let’s just pretend we believe it.)

Now, keeping in mind that China itself has rejected the possibility that this virus came out of one of their filthy “wet markets”, this leaves only one other possibility, given what we know - that the virus came from Wuhan.  That other option is that it came out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.     This is not to say that the virus was created in the lab.  The lab is a “research” installation.  They “research” viruses there.  They gather viruses from wild bats hundreds of miles away and then they study them, play with them, try recombinations of them.  So whether this was a chimeric (lab-created) virus or a wild or mutated virus, this virus came from the Wuhan laboratory.  Last evening, Joshua Philipp aired a fascinating report on the complex involvement of American special interests in the Wuhan lab.

On April 24, the National Institutes of Health (taxpayer funding, in other words) “abruptly” cut funding for coronavirus research that was being conducted in concert with the Wuhan lab.  The study involved how coronaviruses leap from bats to humans causing deadly pandemics.  Gee, I wonder why.  Well, we don’t have to wonder.  According to Science Magazine, the funding was cut because of “conspiracy theories” that the COVID-19 virus was somehow released from the Wuhan lab.  Crazy, right?  Where are we supposed to think the virus came from ?  Aunt Matilda?  The Chinese themselves have eliminated the possibility that the virus sprang from the non-existent wet markets.  The other option is the lab.  It was probably a good time to end the research anyway because the name of the study was “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” and I think we now understand that.

The organization working with China on this project was known as EcoHealth Alliance, Inc., a non-profit which was founded in 2014 for this purpose.  Your tax dollars, to the minimum extent of $15.5 million ($3.1/year x 5 years) supported this research.  The funding was extended for another 5 years in 2019.  That, by the way, was during Trump’s administration, just to keep our timeline straight here.  Well, why not, right?  It was getting great “peer reviews” after all.  And here’s the corker:  $599,000 of the initial funding went to (drumroll . . . ) Shi Zhengli, 

Wuhan’s own “Bat Woman of China”.  Now isn’t it shocking . . . shocking . . . that your money was providing $600,000 up front to the Bat Woman?  Think about that.  You have time.  You are probably out of work like I am.  

And while you listen to the outrage of the scientific grant-grabbers over cutting this funding (well, for one thing we have to foot the bill now for a multi-trillion-dollar coronavirus fund) remember this:  regardless of where the money was coming from to support this research, China is not allowing anyone - that is, anyone - to come into China to take a look at their investment.  The country has sealed itself off from any objective, outside inspection.  I wonder why that would be.  

Time to get out your pencil and paper now.  There’s a lot more to keep track of.  You’ve got the $15.5 million from the NIH.  Now add some more from the Pentagon.  Representative Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA) is now investigating a multi-million-dollar grant from the Pentagon to “a New York firm” that sent taxpayer money to the lab in Wuhan.  This would be the same organization.  The Pentagon gave them $6.5 million of your money.  Reschenthaler is also seeking to learn whether the Department of Defense has also sent money to this Wuhan lab.

There’s more.  Our friend, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has been rejecting the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab as the source of the virus, contradicting both Trump and Secretary of State Pompeo.  It is interesting to learn why.  He is associated with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.  In fact, Fauci is its Director.  Should we be surprised when he intensely rejects the Wuhan lab as the source, even when we know it came from there?  Should we question his objectivity here?  The NIAID provided $7.4 million to the Wuahn lab.  One wonders who suggested Fauci to Trump as a leader of his response team.  Maybe that's another person to look into.

There is a lot to ponder regarding Dr. Anthony Fauci.  He has routinely pooh-poohed various efforts to find drug therapy for the illness.   He has said there is no “proven effectiveness” with  hydroxychloroquine, a well-known drug deemed "safe" and which has been showing beneficial results.  Now, we could take him at his word, being an “expert”, although no one - outside of China, anyway - is an “expert” on this virus.  But he may have other reasons for preferring we all just give up on treatments or relief for the sick.  He is interested in vaccines.  He should be.  That world-class promoter of vaccines for everything, Bill Gates, has invested heavily in the NIAID - Fauci’s organization - in the interest of developing . . . guess what?  Vaccines.  Now, they aren’t presently sending them money, although the NIAID is working on a vaccine.  Gates has earmarked $100 million for development of a vaccine.  There might be value in some vaccines.  However, there is no such thing as a truly "safe" vaccine.  In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court found that vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe".  One would think a disinterested person would always prefer to find an effective treatment for a disease than to inject otherwise healthy people with a virus.  In could be said that vaccines are the enemy of effective treatments for diseases.  It works out that way financially.

Earlier this week I linked an interview with Robert Kennedy, Jr.  I think this might be a good time to go back and listen to that again.  

One might ask, why do these people - and our government - send money to China to do research? We have good laboratories right here in America, don’t we?  Why do we support and promote research in places like China?  The answer is that research done in America is more costly and more restricted.  We don’t just allow dangerous, sloppy research to go on here.  If a laboratory were to have poor standards of safety, or attempt to do unethical, harmful research, it could be inspected and shut down, perhaps worse.  In China no one cares.  Human life is of no particular account in China - at least not to the government which controls research.  If poor protocol results in thousands of deaths, no big deal in China.  They do research which is illegal in America.  Our government, in other words, through the DOD, the Pentagon and the NIH, is engaging in what they know would be illegal in the United States.  They have been pursuing entirely unethical practices, otherwise they would do their research in the United States.  

If we are going to call China to account for this we need to include Dr. Fauci and his support system at NIAID, EcoHealth Alliance and its whole system, the National Institutes of Health which supported EcoHealth’s work with Dr. Shi Zhengli and the government of China, the officials involved in biological warfare in the Pentagon, the Department of Defense and any other taxpayer-supported entity which either directly or indirectly, was even remotely associated with Shi Zhengli, the Wuhan Institute of Virology or the communist government of the People’s Republic of China.  We need to start the cleaning up right here at home.  We can begin by taking Fauci off of the “coronavirus response team”.  President Trump needs to distance himself from this corrupt and dangerous man.

Comments:  (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)