Dakota Beacon

The dead giveaway is the current push by Justin Trudeau to confiscate Canadians’ guns and the clatter now going on in the U.S. about the Second Amendment not being “absolute”.  The shooting in Uvalde was a set-up.  Not that it was “staged” per se, but the conditions were left in place and the response so designed as to facilitate such a crime and to maximize its evil effects.  

It is interesting that these events do not spark real conversations and debates about how to protect innocent children in schools or shoppers in malls, etc., but rather seem to be a switch to set off a pre-packaged movement to end our rights to any kind of self-defense and our Second Amendment.  

The Second Amendment was not designed to provide sport for people who like to shoot at birds or hunt deer.  It was specifically put in place to ensure that the citizens of America would never  be left defenseless against a rogue government - like almost all of our Constitution it echoed the determination that there would be checks on an aggressive government, to balance the equation for the protection of all American rights.  Not to “give” rights, by the way, but to protect our natural rights.  It is important to remember that the Second Amendment, like the First and all of the others, does not bestow a right.  It ensures protection of a right we all have by nature - a birthright.  So Biden is entirely incorrect when he attempts to interpret these rights as some sort of government-granted permission.

I have argued here before that every one of these killers is different and we can’t just examine their stories and thus encourage other confused kids to follow the example of those who become famous for killing.  It has always been my own belief that if the goal is to protect the innocent from these events we must narrow the opportunities and make it clear that there would be no “glorious” mass killing - that the would-be perpetrator would be taken down immediately by an armed citizen - a teacher, a random shopper, a parent, whatever - and the event ended ignominiously with no production of gore.  

While I still believe this, and that we should not in some way “glorify” killing to the confused and perverse thinking of the next possible perpetrator, there are, after all, some very interesting common features among those who have committed these horrific shootings and these correspond ominously with the strange, enabling behavior of school guards and law enforcement.  We were outraged at the unwillingness of the Uvalde police to make any attempt whatsoever to stop the shooting for nearly an hour.  How many kids can you kill in an hour?  That seemed to be their main interest, not the saving of a life inside the school.  In fact, they deliberately refused to let the kids out or parents in to protect them, while standing down themselves.  

It might just be that that is the idea.  Remember what I said in the first paragraph.  If we examine these events as to the response, there is a striking similarity.  In every case these events are not used to learn how to protect, they are used instead for one purpose - a single-minded, focused determination to eliminate our God-given right to self-defense, our Second Amendment.  

If we look at the rest of the so-called “New World Order” we see one common factor - the insistence that we all remain powerless to defend ourselves or our families.  Many years ago Australians turned in their guns to the government - they were supposedly all destroyed.   Perhaps they were.  It doesn’t really matter - they are no longer in the hands of the people of Australia.   Just like the Chinese or the North Koreans, the Australians are rendered impotent when it comes to their own defense.  Same with much of Europe.  Now Canada is joining the eunuch society, at least if Trudeau gets his way (and he usually does in the deeply flawed political system of Canada).  Will America do the same?  

In what universe does lack of physical self-defense produce freedom in a society?  In what world do we find governments devoted to the benefit of the people and their prosperity after stripping them of their means of defense?  

This brief six-minute video presents some facts which may be startling to you.  It did not surprise me, although it informs me.  While the individual shooters may have had their own individual problems and while it is true that the huge publicity awarded to these killers (even if posthumously) encourages others, certain non-individual factors are emerging.  You won’t hear most of this discussed in the public square.  But it is fact, nonetheless, and we must arm ourselves with knowledge of these factors.  Please take a look and then think long and hard about this.  Remember - the intended fruit of this destruction of life, these massacres, is not just sensational news.  It is the impetus for destruction of Americans’ rights.  Think of it that way and it all begins to make sense.  Nothing else really does.

Comments:  (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) (RE: Dakota Beacon)