Dakota Beacon

Not long ago I was having a conversation with my brother, and as often happens with us, our political discussion took its downhill turn as we began to consider the poor health of our social climate in America.  We got to talking about the horrific error committed by the gay movement - meaning the decision to use the movement to destroy the religious freedom of others.  

He said, “I was a ‘live-and-let-live’ kind of person.  I wouldn’t care what people did as long as they were both adults and it was consensual.  But that wasn’t enough for them. They had to start going after other people’s freedom. There’s no reason why a gay couple would insist on destroying the business of a baker, for example, when other bakers were available.  Now everyone is forced to either go out of business or violate their own religious beliefs when a gay couple comes to their door. It’s making them very unpopular.” His point was coming from the idea that we had better be very careful about electing a Pete Buttegieg because he has indicated he would be a very militant kind of gay guy.  

My brother said something to the effect that transgendering is also being forced on us, just short of making it compulsory on an individual.  I said, “Wait a minute. I would say we are there right now.” He was dubious and thought I was exaggerating. I wasn’t. I was referring to the case of James, the 7-year-old twin boy whose mother was insisting on calling hin “Luna” and transitioning him into a “girl”.  I've written about it here before.

This is so far beyond the pale that many can’t quite comprehend what is happening here.  The boy’s mother and father are divorced and she has custody. She happens to be a pediatrician and has become obsessed with the idea of turning this little boy into a little girl.  She sends him to school in dresses, she won’t allow anyone to use his legal name, James. He seems like any other little boy when he is not with his mother. He plays with what we normally (and I use the term advisedly) consider “boys’” toys and plays boys’ games, playing at sword fighting with his brother, wrestling, etc.  He has indicated a preference for the name “James” over “Luna”. This strange behavior of their mother is also a strain on the other twin, Jude. 

Any sane group of adults would be horrified at this woman’s treatment of a little boy.  His father is trying to prevent her harming him, but it seems sane adults are in short supply in Dallas, Texas, juries these days.  A jury just found for the mother’s right to transition this little boy, chemically altering him and continuing this oppressive and strange upbringing.  

Anyone knows that a 7-year-old is not prepared in any way to “explore” his sexuality, to say nothing of making a life-altering decision to become permanently infertile and perhaps health-damaged in other ways.   Kids at this age are not sexualized, nor should they be. When I was that age I played boys’ games - we played cops and robbers, sheriff and bad guys, baseball, we played with toy cars and horses.  I had two brothers and most of the neighborhood kids were boys. I didn’t think for one minute I wanted to grow up to be a man.  I was having fund being a KID. So were they. I’ve seen lots of boys who are surrounded by girls their own age play with toy dishes, stuffed toys and dolls.  It does not mean they want to dress up as girls and grow up to be women. That’s nuts. It means they are having fun being kids. It means they are play-acting, fantasizing. It is like playing pirates. It does not mean we want to grow up and become pirates. Forcing sexuality on a little kid is child abuse and nothing else.  

The jury’s decision here means that this boy will remain a pawn of his mother’s in her sick game of social experimentation.  There need to be laws to protect kids from this.

We don’t allow little kids to smoke or buy cigarettes, to buy or consume alcohol.  We have age-of-maturity laws to prevent child marriages (although this is under assault by Sharia).  We have laws to protect young people from sexual contact with adults. We don’t allow them to buy porn.  There is no reason in the world to permit a parent (or anyone else) to abuse a child in this way. It should be illegal for anyone to prescribe or offer treatment of any kind to “transition” a child from one sex to the other (and yes, there are only two).  It should be deemed child abuse if a child is forced to cross dress against his/her will. This is something states must begin to do before this harms any more children. The future looks very bleak for James and his little brother Jude. The people on the jury decided to do their own version of virtue-signalling at the expense of a little boy’s childhood and innocence.  We can’t let this happen to others. How heartbreaking for the boy, his brother and their dad. This would be a good time for someone in the legislature to write this law and see it through to passage.

Comments:  (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)