Home Contact Register Subscribe to the Beacon Login

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

THE PREVARICATING PROSECUTOR III, NO. 13: PROSECUTOR PRESENTS AS ILLEGAL EVIDENCE THAT WAS LEGAL!

By Steve Cates on December 16, 2009 at 01:35 pm
2 Comments

During the trial of Sandy Blunt, Burleigh County Assistant State's Attorney Feland presented as evidence of Blunt's guilt of Missapplication of Entrusted Property, records of purchases that were absolutely legal purchases. These legal purchases, per North Dakota Office of Management and Budget Director Pam Sharp, were fully outlined in the “Prevarication Prosecutor II” published in the February 2009 Dakota Beacon.

There are NO records that I have seen that show Burleigh County Assistant State's Attorney in any manner attempted to investigate the legal basis of every individual item charged against Blunt and presented at the trial. Why had Special Investigator Quinn never been instructed by Feland to question the actually legality of each individual purchase? Feland lied to the judge, jury, and citizens of North Dakota in asserting that every purchase offered as evidence was illegal.

Click here to email your elected representatives.

Comments

Avatar for Madknuk

The truth is that what happened at WSI during the Sandy Blunt years was going on before and ONLY when some was going to quit and spill the beans did things all of a sudden become illegal.  If the procedures that SB was following were illegal then they were illegal for many years before Sandy Blunt arrived.  Sandy Blunt was the fall guy because he was from out of town and was throw under the bus to be driven over and over by the unethical people from the NDSA office and the corrupt people from BCSAO.  This would be Feland, Surh and Riha.  Still waiting for that block buster story from the Bismarck Tribune.

Madknuk on December 17, 2009 at 12:55 pm
Avatar for Dress

s reports that he believes that prosecutors of the Burleigh County State’s Attorney’s Office committed criminal violations in the prosecution of Charles Blunt which occurred in 2008. He also alleges that a prosecution witness committed perjury during trial and was involved in a conspiracy with the State’s Attorney Office concerning the prosecution.

This matter is under investigation.

Dress on April 22, 2010 at 08:25 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 
 @ 
<a>
Close Tags

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?