Home Contact Register Subscribe to the Beacon Login

Monday, July 12, 2010

STEVE CATES: INFANTICIDE AND THE HUMANITY OF MCKENZIE

At the time of her birth my niece McKenzie was the most premature (16 ounces) child to be born and survive in St. Louis County, Missouri. She was considered a miracle. Today, at 23 years she is by all accounts “a live wire”. My fondest memory of her was from the family reunion when she was 6 years old. She just wanted to crawl all over me, to be held and cuddled. Such an affectionate kid, a beautiful spirit, so easy to love, a miraculous gift from God. But what if she had never been?

 

Holding McKenzie I realized that she had a beautiful spirit. The realization of the beauty of her spirit, that spark of human kind got me to wondering about the moment that she changed from a genetically unique collection of cells into a human having a spirit. Did her spirit develop after her premature birth during the time that she would have spent in the womb? Did her spirit come into being exactly 9 months after her conception? When is that exact moment when a collection of cells becomes a human?

 

Do we know for sure when it is that an unborn child can feel pain? NO, we do not. Do we know for sure when they have awareness of themselves? NO we do not. Every country in Europe outlaws infanticide based on gestational age unless the killing of the unborn is illegal outright:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6235557.stm

 

In Canada killing a child that is over 24 gestational weeks of age is illegal. In Canada McKenzie, obviously human, could have had her humanity decided by her mother and she could have been destroyed. Obviously she was very, very, very much a human being at that point in her life. In the United States she could have been destroyed up until minutes before her birth even if she had not been born premature and gone the full 39 week period of gestation.

 

Infanticide is barbarism. It is barbarism no matter when in the life cycle that it is done.

 

It seems that on a strictly scientific basis that supporting the killing of the unborn, the taking of innocent life, for whatever reason, is evidence of one of two things. Either someone who supports barbarity of this nature is either ignorant….or having knowledge of the child’s humanity, wicked.

 

Can it be otherwise?

 

If we do not know when an unborn child feels pain, is aware of anything, or when they transition from a "product of conception" to a human, do we not have an interest as a society to protect the most innocent and helpless among us?

Click here to email your elected representatives.

Comments

It sickens me when politicians want to side step this issue. They say it is for the courts. That is bogus. It is the legislature that passes the laws that the courts enforce. The Republican party lost a lot of respect when they controlled the presidency and congress and did not tackle this issue. Could it be they feared a source of fund raising would be lost? I pray for those that don’t see the wrong in killing baby’s before their ability to enter the world on their own, that they may see the error of their selfishness and the missing of the wonderful gift of life.

Eugene Graner on July 12, 2010 at 10:11 am

Thank you for the beautiful and personal story.

Perhaps Fisher Ames said it best in his speech to the Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, January 15, 1788. He drew a harsh distinction between a “pure democracy” and a “representative republic” such as ours, as follows:

“The known propensity of a democracy is to licentiousness* which the ambitious call, and ignorant believe to be liberty.”

*Licentious – disregarding accepted rules and standards; living an unrestrained, immoral life; morally unrestrained; made lower in value,  quality, character, dignity; characterized by or expressing lust or lewdness; tending to excite lustful desires; loosened, lax; abandoned to vice; extremely wasteful; recklessly extravagant; corrupted; seduced; drawn away from work; morally astray; depraved; debased; perverted.

It is precisely the disregard for the responsibility to live honorable lives that is well on the way to destroying our country. If we can’t even refrain from killing babies in the womb, are we civilized? Not yet, if there is any hope left…”

Lynn Bergman on July 12, 2010 at 11:04 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?