LYNN BERGMAN: DOES “SCHOOL DISTRICT CONSOLIDATION” CUT COSTS?
This 59-page research publication (Working Paper No. 33) by William Duncombe and John Yinger was published in January 2001 by the Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. It is available in pdf format at http://www-cpr.maxwell.syr.edu/cprwps/pdf/wp33.pdf.
Twelve Rural School District Consolidations Studied
Consolidation of rural school districts has occurred over the last 50 years as a way to improve school district efficiency. This paper evaluated the cost impacts of twelve consolidations (all twelve combined two districts into one) in rural school districts in New York between 1985 and 1997. The actual consolidation data (number of pupils from each school, the consolidated total, and the average original enrollment are as shown below:
Year District A District B Consolidated Total Average Original Enrollment
1987 290 420 710 355
1987 1990 920 2910 1455
1988 490 250 740 370
1988 480 250 730 365
1988 970 620 1590 795
1989 250 1360 1610 805
1991 270 260 530 265
1992 1010 310 1320 660
1993 420 710 1130 565
1994 250 1640 1890 945
1994 1860 390 2250 1125
1995 690 380 1070 535
Holding student performance constant, the study found that school district consolidation substantially lowered operating costs when small districts were combined. Cost savings ranged as follows:
Cost Savings by Expenditure and Size of School District Consolidation
Expenditure Average Enrollment Size, Two Districts Consolidated Into One 2-300 pupil districts 2-900 pupil districts 2-1500 pupil districts
Operating -22.4% -12.9% -8%
Capital -23.4% +27.9% +62.4%
Instructional, all -18% -8.5% -3.7%
Teaching only -22.5% -11.3% -5.6%
Administration -35.6% -35.6% -35.6%
Transportation -32.4% -22.9% -18.1%
Overall -20% -7% to -9% 0%
Economies of Scale
Five economies of scale are:
Indivisibilities – Economies of size may exist because the services provided to each student by education professionals do not diminish in quality as the number of students increases, as least over some range. For example, central administration, as represented by the superintendent and school board, has to exist whether the district has 100 or 5,000 students.
Increased Dimension – Larger plants (school buildings) may be able to produce output at a lower average cost.
Specialization – The gains from specialization provide an especially compelling justification for consolidation in an era of rising standards.
Price Benefits of Scale – Large districts can benefit from negotiating bulk purchases.
Learning and Innovation – Teachers may be more productive by virtue of the fact that they have more colleagues from which to glean the benefit of “higher group experience”.
Diseconomies of Scale
Five diseconomies of scale are:
Higher Transportation Costs – Includes associated longer commuting times for at least one of the two consolidated entities.
Labor Relations Effects – Larger districts are easier to organize and unions may prevent reductions in staffing that are otherwise inherent in the consolidation.
Lower staff motivation and effort – Larger schools tend to add levels of middle management in administration, even in the face of declining enrollments.
Lower student motivation and effort – Students “at risk” tend to get lost in the numbers.
Lower parental involvement – Parents may feel more “like a number”.
Commuting Times
While this document did not provide any study on commute time, other studies have suggested that student commutes over one hour are highly undesirable. My own experience commuting 49 miles to work for 15 years provides me with a keen appreciation for the one hour limit. In fact, most problems with driver fatigue occurred beyond the 45-minute time frame on the way home. I personally would desire that my child sit in a bus for no longer than 45 minutes for safety reasons alone.
Natural Gas Powered School Busses
Another area not covered by this paper was alternative fuels for school busses. Natural gas was a viable cost saving alternative that first became available for autos and pickups in the mid eighties. At the time of this January 2001 paper, ten years after the first natural gas school bus was commissioned in California in 1991, 14.3% of school busses were equipped with natural gas engines that are 1/3 less expensive to operate than diesel powered engines on an equivalent energy basis. And by November of 2001, approximately 2,675 natural gas powered school busses were operated by nearly 130 school districts in the country.
Natural gas powered school buses emit 40 to 86 percent less particulate matter and 38 to 58 percent less nitrogen oxides than diesel buses. Moreover, natural gas is virtually toxic-free, while diesel exhaust contains more than 40 toxic constituents, about half of which are known or suspected carcinogens.
Conclusions:
Administration and transportation costs were dramatically reduced for all three levels of consolidation studied. Consolidation of “administration” and/or “transportation” sectors ONLY may be worth investigating when outright consolidation is not practical due to travel times.
School bus travel times over 45 minutes should be avoided if at all possible and a maximum of one hour travel time seems to me to be a legitimate upper limit. And Natural Gas powered school busses along with natural gas fueling facilities should be investigated as a way to prevent cancer in our children while saving money that can find better use in the classroom.