Home Contact Register Subscribe to the Beacon Login

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

LYNN BERGMAN: “TOLERANCE V. PROMOTION” - THE GLBT AGENDA

Type letters “GLBT” on a web search and here’s an example of what you will find:

“Welcome to GayFriendlyBiz.com. We strive to provide a venue for those of us in the GLBT community to find businesses, resources and services that are friendly to the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender community. Meaning that are supportive of our issues and our equal rights in all aspects of life, including marriage, employment, housing and all other respects.

Here you can find anything from gay friendly professionals like counselors, attorneys, accountants and doctors to glbt friendly travel resources, like inns, bed & breakfasts, hotels, travel agents and cruises to gay and lesbian friendly resources for weddings, commitment ceremonies or civil unions. You can also find supportive and charitable organizations within our community and religous organizations that are open and affirming.”


“Tolerance” is not Enough

Your first clue upon reading the above website home page introduction should be the misspelling of the word “religious”. The degree of sincerity of religious expression is revealed immediately; it’s not even important enough to spell correctly.


Note that being “friendly” to the GLBT community includes being supportive of their issues, including GLBT “marriage”; that GLBT “weddings” are referenced along with “commitment ceremonies” and “civil unions” as if they were one and the same; and lastly, that to be “supportive” a business must be “open and affirming”. The point here is that just BEING TOLERANT IS NOT ENOUGH, a business must be AFFIRMING to be listed as a “friendly business”! Webster defines “affirm” as “to say positively; declare firmly; assert to be true”. Webster defines “affirmative” as “a word or expression indicating assent or agreement. For GLBT’s, tolerance is not enough, they want us to agree with them, even convert to their lifestyle.


Early Exposure

My first exposure to homosexuality was in high school. As a naive young man, I had no idea of its presence in my life. A star performer on our high school’s hockey team was chumming around with an un-athletic young man of similar short stature. I found it odd that they began to talk to each other and to others with a slight lisp and in a somewhat condescending and sarcastic manner, neither of them having displayed this oral infirmity before. I was always struck by his distant and slightly arrogant demeanor, but attributed it to his “hockey star” persona. I found out recently that the star performer was and is gay. Research and clinical literature demonstrate that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality, regardless of sexual orientation identity. This is also consistent with the animal kingdom.


The Lesbian “Wedding”

A couple years ago, we attended a commitment ceremony in northern California. The beloved daughter of my first cousin was joined together forever with her lesbian soul mate. All four of the “first born” cousins attended; and in a special twist, all four of their “first born” daughters also attended, including the beautiful bride of my first cousin. Unfortunately, the parents of my niece’s soul mate from India did not fly over to attend the ceremony because they did not approve of it. I believe they will live to regret that decision for the remainder of their lives.


Throughout the lavish three-day affair, we were amazed by the unconditional love that was present among us. I’ve never been quite so proud of my family as we offered up tolerance and love in sincere abundance. I can now look back clearly and say that the ceremony and all of the associated events revealed the true grace of God. He loves ALL of His children and wants the best for ALL of them! The bride commented at the reception that she had never previously felt such an abundance of love generated towards her and her “wife”. I tear up even now at the thought of her gracious comment accepting His expression of love through her entire extended family.


When choosing the card, we were careful to select one which did not use the word “wedding” or “married”, our subtle and instructive way of reminding the young couple that we did not confuse “marriage’ of a man and woman at a “wedding” with the commitment they were to make to each other. We did not mean to imply that a wedding is more important than a commitment, just different from one; equal in importance, perhaps, but not the same. Likewise, we were careful to refer to the beautiful “ceremony” or “joining together”, not the beautiful “wedding”.


The young couple has adopted two babies that will be likely showered with love by their parents and grandparents. The jury in my mind is still out concerning GLBT adoption, but we’re talking California here, not your grandmother’s home town.


There were two negative mini-events that marred the occasion. The husband of the bride’s mother’s sister became intoxicated and used the opportunity of an open mike to practice his stand-up comedy routine, which needed a lot of work. The bride diffused the situation by calming walking up to him, giving him a big hug and deftly transferring the mike from his hand to her dad’s, who returned the event to normalcy. The second mini-event was a highly inappropriate speech concerning gay rights that was delivered at the reception by one of the more militant members of the local gay community. My cousin was visibly upset during the diatribe. We heterosexuals just bit our lips and endured.


My fondest memory, as for any wedding, is of the dancing we enjoyed. On the occasion of noticing a lesbian couple next to practicing “dirty dancing”, I spontaneously yelled out, in true North Dakota fashion, “Get a Room”. The couple immediately looked over at me with initial disdain, but, upon seeing the wide grin on my face and my obviously harmless intent, they laughed and accepted the good-natured “jab” as any couple would!


The main point to be made concerning the three-day event is this; if you are asked to attend such an event, do so with all of the unconditional love you can muster, be yourself, and be ready to both learn and teach a little tolerance and love. Your rewards will be many, as were ours!


The Hard Sell

As stated above, for GLBT’s, tolerance is not enough, they want us to agree with them, even convert to their lifestyle. Further, they are promoting their GLBT lifestyles as if by doing so, they can some day convince enough people to embrace it for it to be considered “mainstream”. The combining of gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transsexuals into one group is an obvious attempt to maximize numbers but presents an interesting dichotomy. While the combining of the four groups (really only three groups since transsexuals are an extreme rarity) increases the number, the total is still documented at only about1.51% of the United States population*.


*The National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS), published in the book The Social Organization of Sex: Sexual Practices in the United States (1994), by Laumann, Gagnon, Michael and Michaels is referenced. 1.51% of the total U.S. population identifies themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual, or 4.3 total million Americans. Lesbians make up 0.32% and Gay men make up 0.70%, leaving 0.49% as Bisexual.


A coalition of leading pro-homosexual activist groups recently claimed in a legal brief that 2.8 percent of the male population and 1.4 percent of the female population (4.2% in total) identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual. In fact, the referenced NHSLS report that was cited in the homosexual groups’ brief refers as well to “the myth of 10 percent,” a historic attempt to make such sexual practices more universally accepted.


So only 1.51% of the population can be substantiated as GLBT, yet 4.2% of the population identify themselves as GLBT, and many GLBT websites insist on the 10% myth. Claims by the GLBT community of numbers higher than can be documented are indicative of their desire that the numbers be large enough to substantiate to the general public what researchers already know, that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality.

The above information is presented to provide some insight as to why the GLBT community seems to be insistent on PROMOTING their “variant” (not deviant) behaviors. They want the percentages (and their self-image) to increase!

LGB Adoption

In the U.S., LGB people can legally adopt in all states except for Florida. There is no scientific basis for concluding that gay and lesbian parents are any less fit or capable than heterosexual parents. Public opinion, however, is another matter. The Australian Family Association (AFA) on November 30, 2009 said that Queensland government plans to allow gay couples to access altruistic surrogacy is not supported by the wider community. A Galaxy Poll commissioned by the association reportedly indicates nine out of ten people believe children should be raised by a mother and father.


A Word to the Wise

GLBT’s should rightly demand their constitutional civil rights as have minorities, women, the disabled, and others. GLBT’s should learn to understand that the majority of Americans do not consider a union between those of the same sex as “marriage”. The Webster definition of marriage is “The state of being married; relation between husband and wife; married life; wedlock; matrimony.” They insult us when they call their lifelong commitments “marriage”. They are a variant portion of the population; as such they should get together and agree to the most appropriate term(s) to employ in describing their lifelong commitments. “Civil union” seems cold and institutional; “commitment ceremony” sounds like a gathering of friends before being locked up. My own favorite is to call it what it is, a “Spiritual Coupling” of two individuals toward mutual lifelong spiritual growth.

GLBT’s should understand that we heterosexuals love them and cherish their varied and numerous contributions to society, as long as they do not “promote” their lifestyles to our children.

While the mental health community has almost uniformly insisted that homosexuality is biological, most Americans are skeptical of this belief. We all know of instances where confused teens are introduced by outside forces to homosexuality as an “easy way out” of the stress of male-female dating and other pressures.


My Personal Beliefs

Some people, whom we call homosexual, are driven to resist nature’s overwhelming hormonal mating signals at puberty.

I believe that no one is born gay. The mere idea that that is possible is a flimsy fabrication of sloppy journalists, lazy therapists, and distracted (by larger issues) geneticists, unwilling to delve deeply and diligently into the human psyche or to prove a definitive genetic connection. I believe that any person, male or female, who cannot feel the sexual allure of the opposite sex, has been traumatized by some early combination of social circumstances.

I also believe that we must all be tolerant and accepting of those who choose this path, but we must draw the line at the promotion of such lifestyles as “mainstream” when we know them to be a variation of the human sexual condition and contrary to our spiritual mandate to procreate. Homosexuality must be tolerated, even embraced, for the diversity it brings. Promotion and marketing of the lifestyle and attempts toward conversion of heterosexuals to increase GLBT numbers, however, is contrary to our values as a Judeo-Christian society.




Lynn Bergman was born and raised in Grand Forks, receiving his Civil Engineering degree from UND. He worked as a municipal engineer in four cities (Grand Forks, Bismarck, Yuma, Arizona, and Colorado Springs, Colorado) over a period of almost 20 years. He then worked for a mining company in North Dakota for another 15 years, retiring in 1998. Development and demonstration of Portland-pozzolan cement and optimally durable concrete has been one of his life’s passions. Political activism is another interest and he is a Director of “Citizens for Responsible Government”, an organization devoted to fiscal responsibility in government. He is President of DuraCement, LLC and is employed part-time by a regional engineering firm.

Click here to email your elected representatives.

Comments

Avatar for Clint F

This article could not be more wrong.  Why?  To quote the last line of the article: “our values as a Judeo-Christian society.”

The fundamental truth that defeats every premise written above is: God says NO.  Homosexuality is sin.  Are we told by the Bible to accept and tolerate sin?  Hardly…rather, the opposite.

I’m not singling out homosexuals here.  Lying, pride, theft, murder…all those are sins as well.  I’m not even trying to elevate one sin above another.  We have to assess them all against a pure, just God who will tolerate NO sin in His presence.

What’s next…do we tolerate and accept professed thieves?  They too have made a lifestyle choice.  Are we to make excuses for murderers?  Absolutely not.  Have you heard of anyone planning any “Liars’ Pride” parades?  Why, then should we decide to grant “civil rights” to people who choose a perverted sexual practice, simply because they’ve got a pretty good marketing campaign?

“Tolerance” and “acceptance” of homosexuality is a slippery slope.  You can’t separate the sin of homosexuality from the practices of GLSEN, NAMBLA, or anyone else who wants to teach kids to experiment and encourage them to be “gay.”  Gay “marriage” isn’t about two starry-eyed queers trying to form a loving union, either.  It’s about trying to acceptance of their own personal behavior, not the “movement.”  It’s still a foot in the door for the larger agenda, however.

I’ve had several homosexual friends in the past.  My loving advice to them is to turn from that sinful path.  I’m not going to go around hating people because they choose this sin, but I’m also not going to condone it, tolerate it, or affiliate myself with it in any way.  The homosexual community needs to accept and tolerate that.

Clint F on March 10, 2010 at 02:56 pm
Avatar for Jennifer W

How lucky you were to be born heterosexual.

Until people different from yourself are viewed as more than simply defective and only worth your “tolerance,” no progress for humankind as a whole can be made.

I suppose it’s only fair I can ask people of this mindset not to “promote” it to MY children someday.

Also, for being so critical of a typographical error, you should know that the proper plural form of GLBT would be GLBTs. No apostrophe needed, as it is not possessive.

But it’s not important enough to get it correct, right?

Jennifer W on March 10, 2010 at 08:02 pm

Jennifer W,

“Simply defective” are your words, not mine. My words were “normal and positive variations of human sexuality”. A “variation” is just “different”.

If you read carefully, you’ll see that I’m on your side except for suggesting the descriptor “spiritual coupling” rather than marriage. Re-writing the dictionary and the Bible are goals you will never achieve; Set your goals within reason?

Good luck Jennifer, you are loved!

Lynn Bergman on March 11, 2010 at 12:17 pm
Avatar for J Rich

Tolerate a sinful and deviant lifestyle? No.
“If you do not hate sin, you embrace it by default”.
God requires repentance from all of us. Something the GLBT do not want to do.

J Rich on March 12, 2010 at 01:25 am

God is love. Judge not lest ye be judged. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

For a defined “sin” to get my attention, someone must be harmed or must be threatened harm. That is the line my article has tried to draw in the sand.

As my beloved brother Randy always says, “Can’t we all just get along?”

Where were your comments when my articles centered on other issues? Why is this one such a sore point? Look inside of yourself for the answer.

Lynn Bergman on March 12, 2010 at 03:19 am
Avatar for Clint F

“Judge not lest ye be judged.”

This must be the most often misused portion of scripture ever.  I know, I misused it myself before I actually read the Bible.

This portion of scripture essentially says “clean up your own sin before you point out the sin of others.”  It does not say, “give all sinners a free pass.”  Read Matthew 7 for yourself - all of it - and you’ll see that we’re not told to go ahead and tolerate sin wherever we find it.  We’re told to address our own sin first.

“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.”

This has to be the runner up.  In John 8, after Jesus told the angry mob “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her,” what did he say to the adulterous woman?  “Go, and sin no more.”  That’s the message to homosexuals: sin no more.  It should be said lovingly, but it needs to be said.

Ultimately, God does the judging.  We all must answer to His standards, not our own.  Sure, God is love.  He’s also perfect, just, and righteous.  He can’t be those things if he overlooks sin just to be a nice guy.

Clint F on March 12, 2010 at 03:26 pm

I forgot to mention why I haven’t commented on other posts.  I don’t regularly read the Beacon online, as much as I eagerly await the print issue.  I happened to do so this time around.  I also haven’t disagreed with you before this, as far as I can recall! :)

Clint F on March 13, 2010 at 03:14 pm
Avatar for Sally Morris

The posting above are just another example of what keeps going wrong with the people on the “Right”.  We have a nation so far in debt that our very sovereignty is on the edge of a precipice.  We have terrorists not only in our midst, but in our military.  We have a president who is urging Congress to ignore us, the voters and taxpayers, and ram a hated health care bill down our throats.  We have an economy in ruins and home foreclosures up the wazoo.  We have enemies all around us gaining strength every hour as we lose ours.  Korea - when will they decide to send us a bomb?  What about Iran?  At home we are looking at an increasingly oppressive government, not only federal but right down to city government, that wants to take away our right to bear arms, our property and the enjoyment of it, tell us what nutritional supplements we may buy and in the case of the unborn, our right to even live.  With all of this, it is just about time those who are patriotic enough, who love America enough to care about THESE things, get off the case of the homosexual citizens.  If they pay taxes, if they obey our laws (as far as we can tell outside of their bedrooms) we should leave them alone, give them the respect we would give anyone else and move on.  Lynn Bergman is right.  I, for one am fed up with “conservatives” who are more interested in how they are better and purer than their fellows.  The Bible, much as it is instructive to many in the right ways, was written by the hand of man.  I am not ready to accept that we know enough to judge others.  This is not to accept the concept of “relativism”.  That would be more like, it is better to slash someone’s tires than to rape his sister.  What Lynn Bergman is saying, is, whether we “condone” (and doesn’t that just sound pretentious?) homosexuality, we need to leave people some privacy.  Yes, I get sick of some “gay” folks who talk incessantly about their private affairs, or hint at them.  This lifestyle doesn’t interest me. I’m sure part of it could be just the desire to be “accepted” - I would imagine for many they are dealing with lots of pressure and some estrangement from friends and family.  But, as for me, I’m still hung up on whether we will have a country to call home by this time next year.

Sally Morris on March 14, 2010 at 10:52 pm

If you understood biblical Christianity, you’d know that the Christian doesn’t consider themselves any purer than anyone else.  Why do you think we need Jesus?

I’m not willing to turn a blind eye to moral issues just because economic and national security issues are so dire as well.  Sure, we’ve got a full plate in defending our nation, but it’s worth defending on all fronts.

You can’t talk about homosexuality and privacy when the “agenda” is non-stop.  It’s ever present in the media, it’s working its way into the schools, and even into some churches (ELCA, Episcopal).  Now it’s on the verge of becoming illegal to hold the Biblical belief toward homosexuality, in a nation that was founded by people seeking freedom from religious oppression!  Hate crime, anyone?

We are a nation that was founded on principles, and I’m certainly not budging on mine.

Clint F on March 15, 2010 at 12:55 am
Avatar for Sally Morris

Go ahead.  Rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic if you feel you must.  Don’t expect all of us to join in the project.  I don’t enjoy hearing about gay lifestyles and “culture” either.  I would get along better with them if they would guard their own privacy and not make an issue of their “specialness”.  But hearing constantly from those who appoint themselves as the arbiters on the other side is destructive.  Everyone has to decide for himself.  Is your energy better spent fuming about someone who doesn’t live his personal life as you do and pontificating on his faults or is it perhaps more effective in the long run to solve the problems of state and save our nation.  We are being fired upon overseas, we are looking down the barrel of the most egregious violation of our Constitution since 1789 by our own elected leaders, we are about to go down the rabbit hole of monetized debt.  Do you REALLY think it matters to the rest of us what private citizens choose to do in their own homes?  No one needs to threaten your right to your own decisions in personal matters.  No one needs to attack your faith.  That’s not what this is about.  Before we know it we will lose the right to practice our faith not through what any gay individuals are doing but through loss of our national sovereignty and domination by Marxists - either foreign or domestic.  I have never heard that Christians fared really well in Communist China, although I know they are trying.  But if we lose our sovereignty we might need to bow our heads and accept what the Chinese have been forced to accept - things like forced abortion for example.  Now stop fuming about your neighbors and just focus on the survival of America first.  I value Judeo-Christian beliefs and recognize that they are part of the foundation of this nation, and provide the best possible value system.  I share those values.  But I also value the survival of America.

Sally Morris on March 18, 2010 at 07:46 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?