Home Contact Register Subscribe to the Beacon Login

Friday, October 16, 2009

MARK STEYN: LIES ABOUT QUOTES AND ADMIRING COMMIES

Here is a tale of two soundbites. First:

“Slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m
just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer
after dark.”

Second:

“The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my favorite
political philosophers, Mao Tse Tung and Mother Teresa. Not often
coupled with each other, but the two people that I turn to most to
basically deliver a simple point, which is: You’re going to make
choices… But here’s the deal: these are your choices; they are no one
else’s. In 1947, when Mao Tse Tung was being challenged within his own
party on his own plan to basically take China over, Chiang Kai-Shek and
the nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army… They had
everything on their side. And people said ‘How can you win..? How can
you do this against all of the odds against you?’ And Mao Tse Tung says,
‘You fight your war and I’ll fight mine…’ You don’t have to accept the
definition of how to do things… You fight your war, you let them fight
theirs. Everybody has their own path.”

The first quotation was attributed to Rush Limbaugh. He never said it.
There is no tape of him saying it. There is no transcript of him saying
it. After all, if he had done so at any point in the last 20 years,
someone would surely have mentioned it at the time.

Yet CNN, MSNBC, ABC, other networks and newspapers all around the
country cheerfully repeated the pro-slavery quotation and attributed it,
falsely, to Rush Limbaugh. And planting a flat-out lie in his mouth
wound up getting Rush bounced from a consortium hoping to buy the St
Louis Rams. The NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the talkshow host
was a “divisive” figure, and famously non-divisive figures like the
Reverend Al Sharpton and the Reverend Jesse Jackson expressed the hope
that, with Mister Divisive out of the picture, the NFL could now “unify”.

The second quotation – hailing Mao – was uttered back in June to an
audience of high school students by Anita Dunn, the White House
Communications Director. I know she uttered it because I watched the
words issuing from her mouth on “The Glenn Beck Show” on Fox News. But
don’t worry. Nobody else played it.

So if I understand correctly:

Rush Limbaugh is so “divisive” that to get him fired leftie agitators
have to invent racist soundbites to put in his mouth.

But the White House Communications Director is so un-divisive that she
can be invited along to recommend Chairman Mao as a role model for
America’s young.

From my unscientific survey, US school students are all but entirely
unaware of Mao Tse-Tung, and the few that aren’t know him mainly as a
T-shirt graphic or “agrarian reformer”. What else did he do? Here, from
Jonathan Fenby’s book Modern China, is the great man in a nutshell:

“Mao’s responsibility for the extinction of anywhere from 40 to 70
million lives brands him as a mass killer greater than Hitler or Stalin.”

Hey, that’s pretty impressive when they can’t get your big final-score
death toll nailed down to within 30 million. Still, as President Obama’s
Communications Director say, he lived his dream, and so can you,
although if your dream involves killing, oh, 50-80 million Chinamen
[CORRECT] you may have your work cut out. But let’s stick with the Fenby
figure: He killed 40-70 million Chinamen. Whoops, can you say “Chinamen”
or is that racist? Oh, and sexist. So hard keeping up with the
Sensitivity Police in this pansified political culture, isn’t it? But
you can [ITAL>]kill[ and dandy: You’ll be cited as an inspiration by the White House to an
audience of high school students. You can be anything you want to be!
Look at Mao: He wanted to be a mass murderer, and he lived his dream!
You can too!

The White House now says that Anita Dunn was “joking”. Anyone tempted to
buy that spin should look at the tape: If this is her Friars Club
routine, she needs to work on her delivery. But, for the sake of
argument, try a thought experiment:

Midway through Bush’s second term, press secretary Tony Snow goes along
to Chester A Arthur High School to give a graduation speech. “I know it
looks tough right now. You’re young, you’re full of zip, but the odds
seem hopeless. Let me tell you about another young man facing tough
choices eighty years ago. It’s last orders at the Munich beer garden –
gee, your principal won’t thank me for mentioning that – and all the
natural blonds are saying, ‘But Adolf, see reason. The Weimar Republic’s
here to stay, and besides the international Jewry control everything.’
And young Adolf Hitler puts down his foaming stein and stands on the
table and sings a medley of ‘I Gotta Be Me’, ‘(Learning To Love Yourself
Is) The Greatest Love Of All’ and ‘The Sun’ll Come Out Tomorrow’.” And
by the end of that night there wasn’t a Jewish greengrocer’s anywhere in
town with glass in its windows. Don’t play by the other side’s rules;
make your own kind of music. And always remember: you’ve gotta have a
dream, if you don’t have a dream, how you gonna have a dream come true?”

Anyone think he’d still have a job?

Well, so what? All those dead Chinese are no-name peasants a long way
away. What’s the big deal? If you say, “Chairman Mao? Wasn’t he the
wacko who offed 70 million Chinks?”, you’ll be hounded from public life
for saying the word “Chinks”. But, if you commend the murderer of those
70 million as a role model in almost any schoolroom in the country from
kindergarten to the Ivy League, it’s so entirely routine that only a
crazy like Glenn Beck would be boorish enough to point it out.

Which is odd, don’t you think? Because it suggests that our present age
of politically correct hyper-sensitivity is not just morally unserious
but profoundly decadent.

Twenty years ago this fall, the Iron Curtain was coming down in Europe.
Across the Warsaw Pact, the jailers of the Communist prison states lost
their nerve, and the cell walls crumbled. Matt Welch, the editor of
Reason magazine, wonders why the anniversary is going all but
unobserved: Why aren’t we making more of the biggest mass liberation in
history?

Well, because to celebrate it would involve recognizing it as a victory
over Communism. And, after the left’s long march through the
institutions of the west, most are not willing to do that. There’s the
bad totalitarianism (Nazism) and the good totalitarianism (Communism),
whose apologists and, indeed, fetishists can still be found everywhere,
even unto the White House.

Rush Limbaugh’s remarks are “divisive”; Anita Dunn’s are entirely
normal. But don’t worry, the new Fairness Doctrine will take care of the
problem.



© Mark Steyn 2009

Click here to email your elected representatives.

Comments

No Comments Yet

Post a Comment


Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?