|
|
STEVE CATES: ETHICS COMPLAINT RESPONSE - RIHA, SUHR, AND FELAND - TELL….LIES? |
Richard Riha, Lloyd Suhr, and Cynthia Feland signed a statement addressing my attorney ethics complaint in which they absolutely did not tell the truth.
If these prosecutors had the S/A Quinn BCI reports in their possession and had provided them to Mr. Blunt (as has been claimed in numerous motions, arguments to the N.D. Supreme Court, and multiple times by Ms. Feland during her Disciplinary Board hearing, as well in various documents before The Court subsequent to my complaint), why in the world did those prosecutors of Blunt (Riha, Suhr, and Ms. Feland) explicitly state that “he complains of a failure to disclose statement which never existed”?
There is only one possible answer to this question….. Riha, Suhr, and Ms. Feland absolutely knew that she had NEVER given the November 2007 BCI Quinn Reports to Mr. Blunt!
Making a false statement in an ethics procedure is likely more than bad form, or violation of attorney ethics.......it is illegal.
But.....what do you think?
READ MORE...






