Dakota Beacon

In recent comments to CBS’s Leslie Stahl, Carter blasted Kennedy, blaming him for the Carter administration’s inability to pass a national ‘health plan.’ Carter described Kennedy as ‘irresponsible and abusive.’ ‘The fact is that we would have had comprehensive health care now,’ Carter told Stahl, ‘had it not been for Ted Kennedy’s deliberately blocking the legislation that I proposed in 1978 or ‘79…. It was his fault. Ted Kennedy killed the bill.

These words are being written en route from Adelaide, home to a Melbourne whose already thuggish public culture has been rendered that little bit more desolate by the news that Joseph Sobran is no longer with us. Others undoubtedly shall bring their expertise to bear regarding Joe's importance to America. Perhaps a few words might be appropriate on the topic of Joe's importance to Australia (a country he never visited), or, at least, on his importance to one particular Australian.

To paraphrase an old saying: News is News is News. But most of us know that “News” is managed: it’s manipulated, dressed up, revealed in part, or delayed in reporting, or not reported at all. Depends upon the news source doesn’t it? We have learned that the old and trusted sources of news are no longer trustworthy; we refer to them as the Main Stream Media, MSM for short. The short list of MSM’s would be: Television networks ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS (Public Broadcasting); Cable networks CNN, MSNBC; radio network NPR. On the print side of news is the Associated Press, called the AP--the giant of the news industry who supplies (sells) prepared copy of the news to perhaps 90% of our nations newspapers; exceptions may be large daily papers who have their own reporters and writers such as the New York Times, LA Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and perhaps a few others. Many of these papers will include stories from AP in their daily press; the exception may be the Wall Street Journal with a rare printing of an AP story when it is germane to their article.

One particular time in church, my son was looking through a stack of pictures my wife had given him, as the scripture reader walked up to the lectern.  When the reader got ready to read, my son saw a picture of himself and he yelled out, “Who’s that bonehead?”......

Since the beginning of this thing which humans call "industry," the natural progression has been for jobs to originate in a high-cost place of origin, usually where the product being built was invented. The jobs eventually end up in a low-cost manufacturing operation somewhere else. This is an economic truth. One can pretend not to see, but one cannot avoid the truth--not for long.

The American free market has been operating with staggering success for two centuries. Over that time, the American economy has been the fastest-growing economy that the world has ever known. We've had the fastest-growing prosperity in the history of civilization. The free market made it all possible. And the darned thing runs best when left free.

The libertarian chant, “I don’t care what you do, just lemme alone” sounds very reasonable, indeed.  But as hate-speech laws, forcing people to buy health insurance and a thousand other nanny-state intrusions prove, when people become morally corrupt enough, they don’t leave you alone.  They tyrannize you.  A prerequisite for anything resembling libertarian government is cast-iron morality in the people.  And we should remember that, to echo Thomas Paine, “Virtue is not hereditary.”

On the broadest level, Dr. Ritenour and I are both interested in the relationship between social conditions and human action. We are both advocates of free markets, believing that they contribute more to human thriving than other arrangements. We also agree that there is a moral dimension to human action, and that the system of exchange established in any society is, thus, a moral issue as well as a pragmatic one. Within that common ground, however, there is still much to discuss.

Crowd behavior is a good measure of Norsk Hostfest’s success. The entertainment, music and displays are all family oriented and consequently draw decent people. Then again, good behavior may also stem from the older more mature attendees. The gentle cultural appeal naturally draws a gentler crowd. Add to this the fact that, with a few exceptions, Hostfest is alcohol-free and you have a sober more docile gathering.

Uniquely, Norsk Hostfest celebrates cultural pride among those of Nordic heritage and descent. In this era of political correctness where Europeans are often portrayed as more of a liability than an asset, it is refreshing to witness a healthy self-respect for Caucasian heritage.

Barack Obama will relentlessly seek and sometimes find fleeting moments of feel-good. But as the recipe condemns yet another generation of low earners to low earning, Obama’s relentless seeking will distract him from making the connection between the lousy results and the recipe.

The scattered feel-good moments will never be enough to satisfy. So the man will go on scouting for victims that aren’t yet aware of needing to be saved. For Barack Obama, finding something to make him feel good inside will be a lifelong job.

Eric Sevareid, Norwegian Cowboy, Yellowbird is tribal press secretary and spokeswoman, ND retains the national extreme temperature record, it seems like he was a director of almost everything, medical inflation is running about 9%, move to ND the poverty rate is only 11%, Bristol Palin will take time away from “Dancing With the Stars”, The Forum awarded Leafy Spurge, Rep. Earl Pomeroy’s close race, laws regulating ND pharmacies, ugly little architectural appendages next to bars, They are embezzlers, ND median household income rose

Perhaps the biggest lie about “conservatives” is that they are selfish, out for only themselves. In fact, how I ferret out “imposters” is with simple tests of selflessness.

Near the end of a recent meeting of self described “fiscal conservatives”, a member of the group asked “what is a fiscal conservative”. I literally jumped at the opportunity to say “we’re selfless!” I further explained that all of us who regularly attend these meetings are pretty much self-made men and women who understand that what we give back, our legacy to our children and grandchildren, is the most important thing to us. I can’t deny that a few sets of eyes in the group were surprised at my answer; they are the conservatives that haven’t quite got the “true conservative” thing down to a science…

What follows is a review essay of Peter Wyden’s book, Day One: Before Hiroshima and After (New York: Warner Books, 1985).  It is a remarkable book in that it addresses the spiritual and psychological reactions the development and detonation of The Bomb elicited from those individuals most closely associated with its birth.  Whether we feel that way or not, we have entered a new period of widespread nuclear threat, which is why I am drawing attention to Wyden’s classic work.

Instead of sticking to the main theme of reining in an insanely expensive and increasingly intrusive government, the pledge was padded with statements designed to rally the traditionally Republican pro-life, pro-military, and small business constituencies. Yes, those areas are important, but the single issue that unites the largest number of Americans today is the concern that if we don’t check runaway government soon, we never will.

The too-broad pledge ends up being a hodgepodge of clichéd sloganeering, it offers superficially bold but often frustratingly vague proposals, occasionally dubious math, and at least one glaring omission.

What began as a chance encounter and question became a learning experience about a key aspect of the modern conservative movement in America.

I just happened to be in the Mayflower Hotel in Washington DC on September 11 and noticed a registration table for an event at the hotel with a sign which read, "The Sharon Statement".

As we chatted I learned that the authors of the Sharon Statement had been instrumental in defining the modern day conservative movement.   Out of this came the YAF (Young America's Foundation), who were sponsoring the event at the Mayflower.

The constitutionality of these “economic development” schemes has never been addressed by the courts. The state legislature enacted NDCC 40.05 and 40.57. Both are in direct conflict with the state constitution’s prohibition against giving taxpayer money to private entities for any reason, except the support of the poor. Neither has been challenged.

There is no sense in striving to become exceptional only to become a target for vitriol. In a real sense, the American dream is being strangled.

These points and others are addressed in the theme Victor Davis Hanson discusses in his recent article “A Nation of Peasants.” Hanson was Professor of Classics at California State University, Fresno, and is now Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute. He is the author of several books including “Fields Without Dreams: Defending the Agrarian Idea” (1996) and “The Other Greeks: The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization” (1999). He and his family live and work on his family farm near Selma, California.

When the American nation was struggling to be born, Tom Paine articulated the sense of the American people and gave them a voice. Now when much of America senses things have gone terribly wrong, another voice has articulated the unease so many of us feel. 

The special summer issue of The American Spectator featured a cover essay by Angelo Codevilla, ‘America’s Ruling Class – and The Perils of Revolution.’  After the article was posted online Rush Limbaugh devoted an entire show to discussing it and reading large parts on the air. Traffic was so heavy it briefly shut down the Spectator’s web site.

Freedom works whenever it’s tried because it’s moral. Freedom starts with protecting private property rights from the looting masses who would otherwise use the ballot box as an instrument of plunder. Freedom cannot exist without private property rights. Private property rights cannot coexist with socialism for long.

Socialists despise people who work hard and become wealthy.  Rather than working harder to improve their own lives, they strive to live off of the labors of others and look to government to make the achievers poor like them. We used to call these people “losers”.

Paradox on the Prairie, The small-town blues, Can it be done at a profit?, Neighbors immediately crouched in a defensive position, a highrise city in the Arctic, Yet the Fargo Forum remains in denial, NDSU and leadership, college readiness, Devils Lake sees an emergency, parts of the city of Devils Lake are 22 feet lower than the lake, Your federal dollars at work, Ag subsidies, Social Security and Medicare

An arts review by Lynn Bergman

The opera points out a character flaw exhibited by far too many wives of absent spouses. But it also answers a question for which many men likely have searched for a suitable answer. When a man finds a woman who possesses the perhaps somewhat unusual character trait of “fidelity”, he rightly feels fortunate and blessed by God.

Those who insist that this opera sends a negative message are dead wrong. It teaches the hurt that infidelity can cause, if in a comedic way. In fact the comedic message of this opera represents, I believe, a most subtle effort by Lorenzo Da Ponte who wrote the libretto (the story line), to reveal “the hurt of betrayal” to opera audiences, something the most fortunate of us were taught by our beloved mother.

Speaking of which, that great adherent of Marx, V.I. Lenin, once said, “The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.”  Given that we have a government poised to do just this — with steep tax increases and rapid money-printing that will cause inflation — should we really be concerned about a candidate’s views on sexual propriety?  Or should we be more concerned about a candidate who may be harboring Marxist passions?

So all the libertines amongst us should know that Christine O’Donnell will not take their sex toys away.  But Chris Coons may want to take all their toys away.  To vote for him is to play with fire.

Some years ago when I was in elementary school, every day began with saying the Pledge of Allegiance followed immediately by singing “My Country ‘Tis of Thee.”  

Today’s schools are so worried about offending someone that this is no longer the case.  We cannot celebrate Christmas... we celebrate the Holidays.  We no longer hear Christmas Carols sung at Christmas.... OH!  Excuse me... Holiday Concerts.  Life in America as we knew it no longer exists.  We see children in elementary schools singing praises to Barack Obama.  We listen to children singing silly songs about Santa and about getting no presents because we don’t want to offend anyone.

I for one am tired of it.

In truth, and especially when it relates to foreign policy, Carter has done far worse than good. More, his failures have resulted from a remarkably strange trust in some awful dictators. Carter’s infamous naïveté has been destructive, long producing inferior results, not superior ones. Carter has been so unique in this regard, and worse than other presidents, Democrat and Republican, that, in my latest book, we placed him on the cover as a symbol of duped Americans during the Cold War; specifically, the June 1979 photo of a smiling Carter kissing Soviet dictator Leonid Brezhnev.

Please understand, I’m not trying to be mean. But self-serving claims like Carter’s should be answered. Intentions are one thing, but results are another. The Carter record should not be celebrated nor emulated.

Nowadays, winning the Nobel Prize in economics recognizes one's talent for embracing the arrogant, condescending attitude of a big government, central planning elitist. Nobel laureate and New York Times resident sage Paul Krugman illustrates the point.

This facet of the progressive attitude is nothing new. Basically, progressives think that the masses are lamebrained fools who must be spoon-fed by brilliant mystics. And progressives invariably assume that the most brilliant people can be found in either academia or government. Kahneman's and Ormerod's nonsense is a "soft" form of the totalitarian central planning that devastated the U.S.S.R. and Communist China.

Obama will bow, try to appease this Venezulean bully thug, agree that it’s the U.S.’s fault.  And this “Obama-fakester-prima-donna” government, Cheer-leaded by Hairy Reed and Na-see Pol-low-see, backed by Blarney Flank, Crisp Dudd, and of course, wafted
around like a hot air balloon by the lemmings and mice in the House and senate, three of which are OUR ND ones.

When writing about Barack Obama’s religious orientation recently, I pointed out that while I do believe he favors Muslim over Western culture, bowing before another — even God — is above his humility grade.  I further mentioned that in keeping with this self-centeredness, Obama is (like all leftists) someone who denies moral reality. 

We see how dangerous Breyer's rationale is by applying it to another area.

Suppose illegal immigrants residing in America go Islamic on us. If the illegals simply turn into murderous zealots, then will Breyer and other "progressives" who "think" as he thinks argue for outlawing public expression that might incite murderous illegals to kick up the murdering to the next level?

Isn't it a lovely country that the enlightened progressives are fashioning for the rest of us unclean, gun-clinging, religion-clinging, bigoted masses?